We all know construction is a risky business—but is your firm doing all it can to evaluate and mitigate risk?
The Managing Risk in the Construction Industry SmartMarket Report risk management report by Dodge Data & Analytics surveyed over 500 owners and contractors to see where we are as an industry today, with regard to managing risk.
The numbers are concerning. The study found that 75% of the industry has experienced a dispute or claim in the last five years. These claims range from construction defects and warranty issues to subcontractor default, termination or failure.
With that in mind, the respondents were further asked to identify the top risk mitigation practices and where these practices provide the greatest value. While owners see risk differently than general contractors or trade partners, 91% of all surveyed in the SmartMarket report agreed that increased collaboration reduces risk. Therefore, it’s no surprise that the top risk mitigation techniques according to the survey are all inherently designed to bring owners and project teams together.
Here are the top three collaborative-driven practices that you might consider employing and why.
1. Formal Brainstorming
Formal team brainstorming, and the inherent collaborative nature of the process is all about finding the best way to build. Done purposefully, the practice can increase reliability, improve safety and project schedule, reduce construction costs and increase a project team’s ability to innovate.
2. Checklists, Forms and Risk Registers
There is wide agreement among owners, general contractors and trade contractors that using checklists, forms and risk registers ‘allow the original intent for the level of project quality to be maintained.’
3. Expert Input
Whether internal or external, expert advisors reduce risk. However, more than 50% of owners and general contractors surveyed use external resources compared to only one-third of trade contractors. And, the study further found that ‘while owners equally value internal and external input, twice as many contractors prefer internal expertise to that secured from external parties.’ Further, for those market segments that heavily rely on external experts, such as general building and industrial, do so because they see a direct correlation to improved project safety—an area that we are all deeply invested.
The value of formal brainstorming, checklists, forms and risk registers and expert input, whether internal or external include: increasing the reliability in overall project performance, reducing the cost of construction and improving project schedule and project safety
Interested in learning how Microsoft Dynamics 365 can help you? Contact our team of ERP experts at Routeget Technologies to learn more and be sure to follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook or connect with us on LinkedIn.
Routeget Technologies is a global provider of the Microsoft Dynamics ERP solution for mid-to-large and enterprise corporations. We specialize in the manufacturing, distribution, and retail industries, and vertically focused on consumer packaged goods (textiles, apparel, footwear, and furniture). Be sure to visit us at www.routeget.com for more information.
Enterprise Architecture & ERP Implementation Governance
Transitioning complex organizational workflows into scalable ERP modernization architectures requires systematic alignment between core operational processes and underlying digital infrastructure across all operating subsidiaries. When executing enterprise deployments within intricate multi-entity business environments, organizations must rigorously prioritize data normalization, chart-of-accounts standardization, and unified telemetry architectures. Establishing resilient, pre-configured integration boundaries across legacy application estates directly eliminates technical debt while ensuring end-to-end data integrity across high-frequency transactional lifecycles. Cross-functional governance committees—uniting financial controllers, supply chain leaders, and enterprise technical architects—remain indispensable for maintaining strict configuration discipline and curbing procedural fragmentation across regional operating units.
Beyond core transactional execution, enduring platform longevity depends on deliberate organizational enablement and continuous operational validation across all stakeholder tiers. Implementing isolated sandbox environments, automated regression testing frameworks, and formalized release cadence protocols enables business units to absorb continuous platform enhancements without introducing unexpected downtime or operational friction. Enterprises that deliberately pair proactive telemetry monitoring with targeted role-based training programs consistently achieve accelerated user adoption, compress post-go-live stabilization horizons, and maximize the long-term return on strategic technology investments. This disciplined operating model provides the institutional agility needed to scale operations predictably.
No comment yet, add your voice below!